Digital Broadcast TV: Fraud!

Digital TV Converter Box
Image by RichieC via Flickr

After moving to a new house this past week, we decided to forgo the hassles and expense of cable television (see ya Comcast). Instead, we plan to begin streaming online video, combined with Netflix.

Meantime, we’re still unpacking, buried in the multitude of things to do accompanying a move.  So we’re reliant on the newfangled digital broadcasting world that was rolled in 2009.  Argh.

Reception is awful, and we’re close to most of the signals, living on the near east side of Indianapolis.  Admittedly, we don’t have a fancy multi-directional antenna or a rooftop antenna.  But we do have two setups, one with the digital converter box and one digital television, and both with antennas.

Naturally I assumed that digital TV would be NO WORSE than the old fashioned analog signals that have been around since the 1950′s.  I could not have been more wrong.  Very few stations are received consistently.  Most signals break up and are so unstable as to be unwatchable.  Some don’t come in at all, unless the antenna is repositioned.  There is no antenna position in either setup that brings in all of the major local stations in an acceptable manner.

I wonder if our experience is common to others, but I don’t doubt that it is.  In the old days, people bought fancy antennas if they were in fringe areas (50+ miles from the station transmitters) but we are probably only ten miles from most of the transmitters.  Currently about 10% of US residents do not subscribe to cable or satellite TV.  I’m not sure how they stand it, though.

Right now, I’m thinking that federally mandated digital television is a fraud.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Is Comcast Messing With Your Outgoing eMail?

This has been a lousy week for me as far as computers go.

On Tuesday, I encountered a very potent Browser Hijack virus and I’ve spent the rest of the week trying to rescue my desktop from oblivion.  At this writing it’s running a long string of diagnostics in hopes of getting straightened out.  But that’s not the purpose of this post.

During this time my outgoing email (via Outlook) suddenly wouldn’t send.  Naturally I attributed this to the virus, but it was also happening with the laptop, which may or may not (still don’t yet) have been affected by the virus via the wireless network.

Upon doing a bit of Googling I learned that Comcast–which is my ISP–has been gradually changing its email protocol, and one of the changes is that it blocks Port 25 on your computer because apparently that port is associated with spam.  Checking, I found that indeed Port 25 was the default email port.  Switching it to Port 587 per some geek advisors fixed this problem in a heartbeat.

Wouldn’t it be nice if, when Comcast decides to make changes like this, that it provide notification to its users?

Posted in Marketing Tips | Leave a comment

It’s Twestival Time

Image representing Twitter as depicted in Crun...
Image via CrunchBase

It’s Twestival Time.  Like Thanksgiving, it comes just once a year, so it’s pretty special.  We’ve joined with a number of other marketing and social media folks to help Indianapolis celebrate.

From the Global Twestival site:

What is Twestival™?

On Thursday 25 March 2010, people in hundreds of cities around the world will come together offline to rally around the important cause of Education by hosting local events to have fun and create awareness.  Twestival™ (or Twitter Festival) uses social media for social good.  All of the local events are organized 100% by volunteers and 100% of all ticket sales and donations go direct to projects.  Follow @twestival for updates.

The Impact of Twestival

On 12 February 2009, the first Twestival Global was held in 202 international cities to support @charitywater, who we saw doing incredible work to help the almost 1 billion or 1 in 6 people in the world that don’t have access to clean and safe drinking water.  Over 1,000 volunteers and 10,000 donors fundraised $250k+, which resulted in more than 55 wells in Uganda, Ethiopia and India having a direct impact for over 17,000 people. Watch the videos of the first Twestival well drilled in the village of Mai Nabri, Ethiopia.

This year, there will be rolling Tweetups across the city and in Bloomington, as follows.  Feel free to join any of these gatherings, they’re informal and fun! Meet Pam, Chris and Rick–the Keywerx crew–at Mo’Joe’s between 930 and 11 am.

Time Location Host Hosted By Where?
9:30 AM Mo’Joe Coffee Rick Wilkerson @keywerx Downtown
1:00 PM Papa Roux Dick Davis @davisr66 TBD
Lunch Tie Dye Restaurant Jan Dye @MyTyDye East Side
Lunch Saigon Restaurant Dr Thomas Ho @drthomasho West Side
3:00 PM Hubbard&Cravens Robby Slaughter @robbyslaughter Broad Ripple
4:30 PM Stonecutters Coffee Colin Clark @colinaclark Bloomington
5:00 PM L’evento Boutique Heather @HeatherSong Rangeline and Main (Carmel)
5:30 PM MoonDogTavern Kristie Bradford @KristieKreation 96th and Gray
6:00 PM Fountain Square Ryan Cox @IndytweetUp Fountain Square
Dinner Yats Duncan Alney @firebelly Broad Ripple
Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in Online Marketing | Leave a comment

Is eBay an April Fool?

The headquarters of eBay in San Jose, Californ...

Image via Wikipedia

If you’re a regular seller on eBay, you may already know that eBay has discontinued its popular “Store” format, effective April 1, 2010.

Communication on this topic from eBay has been confusing at best, as they’ve tried to position it as a rate decrease for its “Buy-it –Now” listings rather than a rate increase for those who used the old store format.

The difference between the “Buy it Now” format and the store format is that the former was available in full search, while the store listings are just that—store listings that resided in a less visible environment.

In eliminating stores, eBay has effectively raised the price of a monthly listing for a typical store owner from 3 cents to 20 cents.  This applies to basic store owners who pay $15.95 per

month for the storefront.  A store owner now has the option of paying $299.95 per month for what is called an “anchor” store, which gets them the 3 cent monthly listing fee.  An in-between price point is the “premium” store at $49.95 per month and 5 cent monthly listings.

The  benefit offered with these price increases is that all fixed price listings will be fully searchable.  Whether this is a good trade-off or a bad one is best evaluated on an individual seller basis.  Certainly the net effect of this sweeping change will be easier to evaluate once the price changes go into effect.

As one of those long-time store owners, I can tell you how it affects me.  I’m closing my two stores on 3/31/2010.

I primarily sell collectible vinyl records.  While there is much ballyhoo in the media about the comeback of vinyl, it’s still a fact that most vinyl records–like a very large % of collectibles– are not fast sellers.  Only those with unusually high demand relative to supply will sell quickly on eBay, despite the massive traffic eBay delivers.  So the store format has provided a great solution for items that—while valuable—are not going to sell in a week, a month or maybe even a year even in a high traffic environment.  Much like items in a brick and mortar store, they wait until the right buyer comes along.

Based on the howls of protest on eBay forums and other sites, clearly I am in good company.  eBay will be eliminating a large number of listings with this change and a lot of revenue with those listings.  That may well have been their intent—to rid the site of slower selling merchandise.  If that is the case, we’ll see what the “laws of unintended consequences” have in store for eBay.

If your business needs e-commerce, eBay is less of a solution today than it was before this change.   Unless you are a high-volume seller, eBay has taken a large price increase and priced many of you out of the market.  Is eBay an April Fool?

We’ll be watching closely to see if any of the alternatives to eBay, like Etsy, Bonanzle, eCrater and others are able to take advantage.  More importantly, we’ll be focused on what to recommend for our e-commerce clients in this post-April Fools world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

I’m Not at Foursquare

Foursquare has taken the smart phone set by storm.  There are almost half a million users, each “checking in” at various businesses and vying for points which can lead them to unlock “explorer” badges and become location based “mayors”.  It’s also a tool many use to meet new people; when you’re checked at a certain location, you can find others who are also checked in there.

It’s fun for users and the potential benefits for location-based businesses are considerable.  What business wouldn’t want folks to push their location to the social media world?  Great opportunities for specials, incentives and other promotional ventures are definitely there.  Foursquare is cutting some big deals with national companies because of this potential.

I’m going to disclose my bias right now.  I absolutely can’t stand Foursquare.

It’s the pollution factor.  Foursquare users generate gazillions of meaningless tweets for those of us who follow them, especially on Twitter.  It’s a parade of  “I’m at Starbucks” , followed by the even more exciting “I just became mayor of Starbucks” or “I just unlocked the explorer badge at Starbucks.”

When we talk to potential new Twitter users, the preconception is this: that Twitter exists so people can tell each other where they’re hanging out and what they are having for lunch.  Narcissistic junk.

Generally, our answer has been, well, you wouldn’t want to follow people who do that.  Those people,we say, are not using social media to advantage.  Twitter’s not narcisstic if used properly.  Use social media to provide information, help solve problems, inspire, connect.  Rather quickly, most Twitter users learn to provide value and not add “noise”.

So now we have Foursquare, bringing the noise, bigtime.   Uncomfortably, many people we follow on Twitter who otherwise provide a lot of value are also messing with Foursquare.  The social media gods are pushing it.  There is a lot of trial right now.

We’re not unfollowing people who tweet their Foursquare locations, at least not yet.  But still, it’s annoying.  We hate to see Twitter undermined by a game.

There’s actually a much bigger problem with Foursquare, since by checking in and broadcasting your location, you’re also telling the world where you’re NOT.  As in, not at home.  Hello, burglars.

To graphically illustrate this issue comes a site called Please Rob Me, which picks up Foursquare tweets and offers the information to the web-o-sphere.   As if the bad guys need help.

This is a serious issue, compared to the annoyance factor of useless tweets.  It conjures up visions of “CSI-Virtual World”, a hot new show where villains hack to death hapless social media freaks each week to the sounds of mournful indie rock.  PleaseRobMe.com obviously has hit on a real caution here.

I admit it, though.  “I’m at Starbucks” is what bugs me.  And it really bugs me.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Google Buzz: What Say You?

Mashable says that Google has “has dropped a nuclear bomb whose fallout will permanently alter the social media landscape” with the launch of Google Buzz last week (February 9, 2010).

If you aren’t already clued in to Google Buzz, it’s an expanded function of Google’s popular Gmail.  Click the Buzz icon and see your friends’ posts on Twitter, YouTube, Flickr and other social sites.  But so far, I don’t see how to connect Facebook.  Nor do I see how to add the social network of your choice.  So at this point, it’s limited.

However, because Gmail has so many users (38 million unique users as of 2009, according to Mashable)  Google Buzz debuts as a huge thing, with already more users than Twitter.

The key question for me is this:  how you use Gmail.  I use it primarily as a “personal” address for things not directly related to business and I don’t think I’m alone here.  It’s an accepted best practice to use an email address from your business domain rather than a Gmail address for your business.

So my Gmail address book does not include most of my key business contacts, and since I use social media primarily for business, there’s a disconnect.  In fact, when Buzz launched, it connected me with only about a dozen people  So far, only one of these people is showing up on my Buzz stream.  Not too interesting, eh?  So for me, the net impact of Google Buzz  is not very big.

I know there are many folks using Gmail (especially Gmail for business)  as their primary business email.  Google Buzz will work well for them.   It will also work well for those who do not want to fool with the setup and ramp-up necessary to make Twitter a good experience.   Further, Google will eventually make Buzz more functional and thereby more central to users’ daily lives.

If we’ve learned one thing in the past decade, it’s to never underestimate Google.

What do you think?  What’s Google Buzz doing for you?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News, Online Marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hard Lessons from eBay

This week eBay announced yet another round of substantial changes to its selling structure.  For the past few years, the mega online retailer has re-jiggered its platform and in the process made very few of its sellers happy.

I am a longtime seller on eBay, specializing in collectible vinyl records.  Ebay has long been known as an online auctioneer, but they have been moving steadily away from auctions and towards fixed-price items for several years now,  partially to accommodate big retailers and partially to compete more directly with Amazon.com.

In 2003 I jumped on the relatively new eBay store bandwagon, which provided sellers an opportunity to sell fixed price items for a very small monthly fee.  At the time I think it was a penny per month with a $15.95 per month  subscription.  Low visibility compared to auctions, but search-able.  Maybe two years ago, the price jumped to 3 cents, while they introduced a more expensive fixed-price listing category that was as search-able as auction listings.  These varied in price but were typically 35 cents.  My experience with the store concept was very positive.  Rather than depend on the uncertainty of auction results, a seller could determine the appropriate selling price and wait for the buyer to come along.  Sometimes it took months, but at 3 cents per month it was worth the wait.

Now, they are essentially eliminating the store concept by merging these fixed price listings and store listings.  The price changes are tiered and complicated.  You can still pay 3 cents per listing but instead of paying $15.95 per month for the store fee, you’ll pay $299.95.  Or, you can keep your store fee at $15.95 but each listing is 20 cents per month.  In return for this massive price increase, all store items are no longer segregated from auction items.  Everything is equally search-able.  (There are several other pieces to the fee restructuring, not the least of which are eBay’s “final value fees”  but I’m going to focus on the store listing part of it.)

At the moment, though, I am staring at a whopping 667% price increase for listing items in my store.   To continue my current store strategy, I’d have to have a huge increase in sales to pay the fee increases.  All over the US there are sellers reacting similarly.

I’m trying to see  this as a learning opportunity.  So what are the lessons here?

1. Traffic is King.   eBay occupies a very large niche and owns a huge amount of traffic.  They’ll rent this traffic to you, but you have to play by their rules, or, as my dad used to say, ‘go play on the freeway’.  By achieving near-monopoly status as an online auctioneer, they can and do dictate how things work.  They can tinker and fiddle and the rest of us have to adjust.

2.  Their Business Model Dictates Your Business Model. Tens of thousands of small sellers are making a living by using eBay to deliver their customers.  It has worked well, for many, for a long time.  The problem is that you have no control over what eBay does.  They can force sellers to use Paypal, as they have.  They can tilt the playing field in favor of the buyer, as they have.  They can dictate shipping prices.  They can make the seller responsible for insuring packages.  The seller is simply forced to adapt, or move on.  Many sellers are trying to make that choice right now.  One thing is clear:  they are in charge.

3.  Size Matters. As eBay has cozied up to large online retailers, it has also placed obstacles in the way of the small seller.  This is quite apparent in this new structure.  In their heavily-spun announcement of the changes, they trumpet the opportunity for sellers to get fully search-able 3 cent listings.  Trouble is, it costs the seller $299.95 per month just to be eligible for 3 cent listings.   This won’t be a big problem for Best Buy or other retail giants who sell thousands of dollars of merchandise per day on eBay.  They’ll be able to list items for 3 cents while little folks will have to pay 20 cents.  May the best big man win.

4.  Honesty = Transparency. eBay trumpets “lowest insertion fees ever” but really this is a price increase disguised by a few cosmetic price promotions.  Depending on the individual seller’s situation, some of these changes could actually mean lower fees.  But for the rank-and-file seller, it’s another in a series of price increases and disruptions, each of which has been served up as an improvement for the benefit of the seller.  It’s pretty much consensus now that transparency is a desirable characteristic in business.  eBay is losing the PR war by being less than truthful in its communications to sellers.  They will lose a lot of sellers over this, and perhaps they will alienate enough people to open the door for a real competitor.   A lot of folks who feel abandoned by eBay are hoping that is exactly what happens.

5.  Superior Business Models Win.  And that’s what eBay is thinking when it makes things less palatable for sellers.  In the end, some sellers will stick with it, because, for many, it still beats starting your own e-commerce platform, setting up in an antique mall or starting  a brick-and-mortar retail operation. Until a viable competitor emerges, eBay is still the 900 pound gorilla.  A price increase it may be, but many of us will pay it.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in Online Marketing | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

We Really Are The Media Now

This past Tuesday (January 12) I was  on Facebook and noticed that one of my FB friends had joined the group WFBQ-JIMMY-MAD-DOG-MATIS SHOULD-NOT-HAVE-GOT-FIRED

Huh, I said to myself, while also pondering the grammatical error in the group title.  Didn’t know that had happened.  How did I miss it?

I went right to Indy Star and the Indianapolis Business Journal to read more about it, but there was nothing.  Nothing at all.

Back at the Facebook page, there were dozens of comments of support for Jimmy, and even comments from Jimmy himself  (Be nice to Q95, he said.  He still has lots of friends there).  The page had been started way back on Saturday, January 9, at 11:52 am.  But there was no news anywhere else that I could find via Google.  So I blogged about it on Tuesday afternoon, and then, as I often do,  used Twitter to promote the blog post and the news.  Meanwhile, good old RSS immediately fed my blog post to LinkedIn, Smaller Indiana and Facebook.

It took until Wednesday morning (January 13) for the news to hit IBJ, and until that afternoon for Indy Star to cover it.  FOUR DAYS after the Facebook page was started, the mainstream media was finally on it.

My blogging about Jimmy’ s departure is an inconsequential piece to the story, because I don’t have a large readership.  Every bit of communication sends out its own ripples, though, and that is exactly why I auto-feed my blog to social networking sites, to extend the reach as much as possible.

What is huge is that the news got out on Facebook and people were jumping in to publicly support Jimmy Matis long before the news media was able to catch up and publish something.

That’s not a knock on our local journalists who do a heroic job in the face of great challenges.  It’s a reflection on the contemporary news cycle, as well as the increasingly limited resources at these media companies, as they struggle with their disappearing bottom lines.

It’s certainly true that Twitter and Facebook are proving to be the first–and sometimes only–means of communication when tragedy strikes, such as in Haiti. What’s just as significant to me is that it is no longer possible for big media to consistently deliver the news to the rest of us fast than we can deliver it to each other, even though our grammar may not always be up to par.

PS:  My best wishes to Jimmy “Mad Dog” Matis, a quality guy who I”m confident will land on his feet.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Jimmy “Mad Dog” Matis Fired by Q-95

News of this is just now breaking, apparently it happened at the end of last week.

Jimmy “Mad Dog” Matis, mid-day voice of WFBQ Q-95, has been let go after a mere 25 years at the station. This follows sports talker JMV’s abrupt departure from sister station WNDE and his subsequent replacement by old Q hand Mark Patrick. Matis had filled in for JMV during the part of the transition.  Hard to believe there is not a relationship between these changes and Matis’ being shown the door.

Supporters have started a Facebook page in protest.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Cell Phone Only? Rising Fast.

According to a study conducted during the first half of 2009, more than 21% of all US adults lived in cell phone-only households.  That’s about 48 million and you can bet that number is rising.  Another 14.7% had a landline telephone but still received all, or almost all, of its call via cell phone.

So for practical purposes 35% (and growing) are cell phone only in the US.

Lots of implications for marketers here, yes?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Posted in In The News | Tagged , | Leave a comment